
\begin{table}[htb]
\caption{Robustness check: Table F3 with alternative operationalisation of role conceptions}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c}
\hline
 & Experiment 1 & Experiment 2 & Experiment 3 \\
\hline
Citizens                                               & $1.90^{*}$        & $2.70^{*}$       & $-1.70^{*}$       \\
                                                       & $ [ 1.49;  2.33]$ & $ [ 2.26; 3.15]$ & $ [-2.39; -0.97]$ \\
Benefits                                               &                   &                  & $4.14^{*}$        \\
                                                       &                   &                  & $ [ 3.46;  4.79]$ \\
Citizens $\times$ Benefits                             &                   &                  & $1.60^{*}$        \\
                                                       &                   &                  & $ [ 0.72;  2.44]$ \\
Agree with T2                                          & $0.95^{*}$        & $0.67^{*}$       & $0.03$            \\
                                                       & $ [ 0.38;  1.50]$ & $ [ 0.19; 1.15]$ & $ [-0.72;  0.88]$ \\
Str. agree with T2                                     & $0.33$            & $0.45$           & $0.12$            \\
                                                       & $ [-0.47;  1.16]$ & $ [-0.40; 1.29]$ & $ [-1.06;  1.53]$ \\
Population $\times$ Agree with T2                      & $-1.20^{*}$       & $-0.62$          & $1.02$            \\
                                                       & $ [-1.87; -0.51]$ & $ [-1.33; 0.04]$ & $ [-0.06;  2.07]$ \\
Population $\times$ Str. agree with T2                 & $-0.15$           & $-0.88$          & $0.38$            \\
                                                       & $ [-1.19;  0.89]$ & $ [-2.09; 0.30]$ & $ [-1.55;  2.15]$ \\
Benefits $\times$ Agree with T2                        &                   &                  & $0.28$            \\
                                                       &                   &                  & $ [-0.73;  1.26]$ \\
Benefits $\times$ Str. agree with T2                   &                   &                  & $0.55$            \\
                                                       &                   &                  & $ [-1.00;  1.92]$ \\
Citizens $\times$ Benefits $\times$ Agree with T2      &                   &                  & $-1.12$           \\
                                                       &                   &                  & $ [-2.45;  0.17]$ \\
Citizens $\times$ Benefits $\times$ Str. agree with T2 &                   &                  & $-0.22$           \\
                                                       &                   &                  & $ [-2.10;  1.85]$ \\
Intercept                                              & $4.80^{*}$        & $3.49^{*}$       & $3.76^{*}$        \\
                                                       & $ [ 4.43;  5.15]$ & $ [ 3.15; 3.85]$ & $ [ 3.18;  4.27]$ \\
\hline
N                                                      & $863$             & $863$            & $863$             \\
\hline
\multicolumn{4}{l}{\scriptsize{\parbox{0.95\linewidth}{$^*$ Null hypothesis value outside the 95\% confidence interval. Entries are unstandardized coefficients from a linear mixed-effect regression model. Bootstrapped confidence intervals in parentheses. Countries function as groups. Support for PTAs is captured on an 11-point scale. Item T2 reads `Trade agreements are so technical in nature that ordinary citizens cannot comprehend them.'}}}
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:tableH6}
\end{center}
\end{table}
